Un linguaggio in azione: alcune riflessioni sull’uso dell’iconicità action-based nelle lingue dei Segni / A language in action: some philosophical considerations about the use of action- based iconicity in Sign languages

  • Margherita Murgiano
Keywords: sign languages, iconicity, habit, situated cognition, peircean semiotics


Starting from some issues of the current debate directed to understanding the so-called action-based iconicity, I will focus on the modalities by which the latter is used by signers in order to represent both actions and objects, i.e. when the Core Nouns of their lexicon are articulated through the use of Handling Handshapes. This analysis will show to what extent Sign language users re-enact the practices related to the items they are talking about, representing reality through the habits with which they interact with it. This fundamental notion, which belongs to Peircean Pragmatism, is at the very center of the idea that there is a fundamental link between the ways we act on reality and the ways we confer meaning to it, which has been also emphasized by contemporary research on mind. From these assumptions, I will illustrate that this philosophical framework could be useful not only to look at iconicity in Sign languages, but also to show that these semiotic systems use the same relational dimension highlighted by situated approaches to cognition and language


ARBIB, Micheal, GASSER, Brad, BARRÈS, Victor (2014), «Language is handy but is it embodied?», in Neuropsychologia, n. 55, pp. 57-70.

BELLICCI, Francesco, PAOLUCCI, Claudio (2005), «Peirce e l’iconismo», in Versus, Quaderni di studi semiotici,n. 120, pp. 3-11.

BENEDICTO, Elena, BRENTARI, Diane (2004), «Where did all the argument go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL», in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, n. 22, pp. 1-68.

BOYES BRAEM, Penny (1981), Distinctive features of the handshapes of American Sign Language, University of California, Berkeley.

BORGHI, Anna M., CIMATTI, Felice (2009), Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings, in TAATGEN Niels, VAN RIJN Harmenszzon.(a cura), Proceeding of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam, pp. 2304-2309.

BORGHI, Anna M., CARUANA, Fausto (2013), «Embodied Cognition, una nuova psicologia», in Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, pp. 23-48.

BRENTARI, Diane, PADDEN, Carol (2001), A language with multiple origins: Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language, in BRENTARI Diane (a cura), Foreign vocabulary in sign language: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahawah, pp.87-119.

BRENTARI, Diane, COPPOLA Marie, MAZZONI, Laura, GOLDIN-MEADOW, Susan (2012), «When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners», in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30, pp. 1-31.

BRENTARI, Diane, DI RENZO, Alessio, KEANE, Jonathan, VOLTERRA, Virginia (2015), «Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Sources of a Handshape Distinction Expressing Agentivity», in Topics, n. 7, pp. 1-29.

CASELLI Maria, C., MARAGNA, Simonetta, PAGLIARI RAMPELLI, Laura, VOLTERRA, Virginia (1994), Linguaggio e sordità, Roma, La Nuova Italia.

CAPPUCCIO, Massimiliano, WHEELER, Michael (2011), «The Sign of the hand: Symbolic Practices and the Extended Mind», in Versus, Quaderni di studi semiotici, 113, pp. 33-56.

CRISTILLI, Carla (2008), «Esistono i fonemi nelle lingue dei segni?», in I segni parlano, Franco Angeli, Milano.

CUCCIO, Valentina, FONTANA, Sabina (2011), «Spazio cognitivo e spazio pragmatico. Riflessioni su lingue vocali e lingue dei segni», in Esercizi Filosofici, pp. 133-148.

CUXAC, Christian (2000), «La langue des signes française (LSF); les voies de l’iconicité», in Faits de Langue, 15/16, Paris, Ophrys.

CUXAC, Christian, SALLANDRE, Marie-Anne (2007), «Iconicity and arbitrariness in French sign language – highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity», in Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies, Empirical approaches to language typology, n. 36, pp.13-33.

DEWEY, James, (1938), Experience and education, Macmillan, New York.

ECO, Umberto (1985), Sugli specchi e altri saggi. Il segno, la rappresentazione, l’illusione, l’immagine, Bompiani, Milano.

EMMOREY, Karen, GRABOWSKI, Thomas, MC CULLOUGH, Stephen, DAMASIO, Hanna, PONTO, Laurie, HICHAWA, Richard, BELLUGI, Ursula (2004), «Motor-iconicity of sign language does not alter the neural systems underlying tool and action naming», in Brain and Language, n. 89, pp. 27-37.

ENGEL, Andreas K., MAYE, Alexander, KURTHEN, Martin, KÖNIG, Peter (2013), «Where’s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science», in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, n. 17, pp. 202-209.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella (1983), La polemica sull’iconismo (1964-1975), ESI Napoli.

FRISHBERG, Nancy (1975), «Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language», in Language, n. 51, pp. 696-719.

GALLAGHER, Shaun (2010), Philosophical Antecedents of Situated Cognition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

GIBSON, James (1979), The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Miffin, Boston.

HEIDEGGER, Martin (1927), Sein und Zeit, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen (Essere e tempo trad. di, CHIODI Pietro, Longanesi, Milano1976).

KLIMA, Ursula, BELLUGI, Edward (1979), The Signs of Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

MEIER, Richard P., MAUK, Claude E., CHEEK, Adrianne, MORELAND, Christopher J. (2008), «The Form of Children’s Early Signs: Iconic or Motoric Determinants?», in Language Learning and Development, n. 4, pp. 1-36.

MEIER, Irit, PADDEN, Carol, ARONOFF, Mark, SANDLER, Wendy (2013), «Competing iconicities in the structure of languages», in Cognitive Linguistics, n. 24, pp. 309-343.

MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice (1945), Phénoménologie de la perception, Librairie Gallimard, Parigi (Fenomenologia della percezione trad. di, BONOMI Andrea, Il Saggiatore, Milano 1965).

MONEGLIA, Massimo, PANUNZI Alessandro (2010), «I verbi generali nei corpora di parlato. Un progetto di annotazione semantica cross-linguistica», in Language, Cognition and Identity. Extensions of the endocentric/exocentric language, Firenze University Press, Firenze, pp. 27-45.

MURGIANO, Margherita, NARDELLI, Giulia (2015), «Usi linguistici, strumenti sociali: uno sguardo semiotico su esperienza, linguaggio e percezione», in Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 9, 2, pp. 29-46.

NOË, Alva (2004), Action in Perception, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

ORTEGA, Gerardo, SÜMER, Beyza, ÖZYÜREK, Ash (2014), «Type of iconicity matters: Bias for action-based signs in sign language acquisition», in BELLO, P., GUARINI, M., MC SHANE, M., SCASSELLATI, B., [eds.] Proceeding of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, pp. 1114-1119.

PADDEN, Carol, MEIR, Irit, LEPIC, Ryan, HWANG, So-One, SAMPSON, Tory, SEEGERS, Sharon (2013), «Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons», in Gesture, n. 13, pp. 287-308.

PADDEN, Carol, HWANG, So-One, LEPIC, Ryan, SEEGERS, Sharon (2015), «Tools for language: patterned iconicity in sign language nouns and verbs», in Topics, n. 7, pp. 81-94.

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders (1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Belknap Press, Cambridge.

PERNISS, Pamela, THOMPSON, Robin, VIGLIOCCO, Gabriella (2010), «Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages», in Frontiers in Psychology, n. 1, Boston, pp. 1-15.

PERNISS, Pamela, VIGLIOCCO, Gabriella (2014), «The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language», in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369 (1651), pp. 1-13.

PIETRANDREA, Paola (2000), «L’interazione complessa di iconicità e arbitrarietà nel lessico della LIS», in La Città Invisibile. Atti del 2° Convegno Nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni, Edizioni del Cerro, Pisa, pp. 38-49.

RADUTZKY, Elena (1992), Dizionario Bilingue elementare della Lingua Italiana dei Segni, Edizioni Kappa, Roma.

ROWLANDS, Mark (2010), The New Science of Mind. From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)-London.

RUSSO, Tommaso (2004), La mappa poggiata sull’isola. Iconicità e metafora nelle lingue dei segni e nelle lingue vocali, Centro Editoriale e Librario, Università degli studi della Calabria, Rende.

RUSSO, Tommaso, VOLTERRA, Virginia (2007), Le lingue dei segni. Storia e semiotica, Carocci, Roma.

STOKOE, William (1960), «Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf», in Occasional Paper, 8, University of Buffalo, Buffalo NY.

TAUB, Sarah (2001), Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language, Cambridge University Press, New York.

TOLAR, Tammy D., LEDERBERG Amy R., GOKALE, Sonali, TOMASELLO, Micheal (2008), «The Development of the Ability to Recognize the Meaning of Iconic Sign», in Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(2), University Press, Oxford, pp. 225-240

VIGLIOCCO, Gabriella, VINSON, David P., WOOLFE, Tyron, DYE, Matthew W.G, WOLL, Bencie (2005), «Language and imagery: effects of language modality», in Biological Sciences, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 272, pp. 1859-63.

How to Cite
Murgiano, M. (2016) “Un linguaggio in azione: alcune riflessioni sull’uso dell’iconicità action-based nelle lingue dei Segni / A language in action: some philosophical considerations about the use of action- based iconicity in Sign languages”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 00. Available at: http://www.rifl.unical.it/index.php/rifl/article/view/353 (Accessed: 21June2024).