L’offensività degli slurs. Un’indagine sperimentale / The offensiveness of slurs: an experimental investigation

  • Francesca Panzeri
Keywords: slurs, pejoratives, presuppositions, conventional implicatures, semantics/pragmatics interface

Abstract

A lively debate has developed in recent years regarding the “meaning” of slurs. Content-based theories assume that slurs convey both a descriptive meaning, which makes reference to the target group, and a derogatory component, which conveys hatred against that group. Semantic theories (HOM 2010) and pragmatic approaches that analyse the offensive component as a presupposition (SCHLENKER 2007, CEPOLLARO 2015) or as a conventional implicature (POTTS 2007, WILLIAMSON 2009, McCREADY 2010) differ in the predictions they make about the survival of the offensive component in embedded contexts. We conducted an experimental study that aims at establishing whether the offensive component of slurs exhibits non displace ability (POTTS 2007), comparing the degree of perceived offensiveness of slurs presented in isolation to the offensiveness of a person who utters a sentence in which a slur is negated, hypothesized, questioned or reported. We found that, as stated in the literature, slurs’ offensiveness survives in the context of conditionals and questions; it diminishes in indirect reports; and, surprisingly, it results almost nullified in negated sentences. We interpret these results as indirect evidence in favour of a presuppositional account of slurs.

References

ANDERSON, Luvell, LEPORE, Ernie (2013a), «Slurring Words 1», in Nous, vol. 47, n. 1, pp. 25-48.

ANDERSON, Luvell, LEPORE, Ernie (2013a), «What did you call me? Slurs as prohibited words», in Analytic Philosophy, vol. 54, n. 3, pp. 350-363.

BACH, Kent (1999), «The myth of conventional implicature», in Linguistics and philosophy, vol. 22, n. 4, pp. 327-366.

BIANCHI, Claudia (2013), Slurs: un’introduzione, in LEONARDI, Paolo e PAOLUCCI, Claudio, a cura di, Senso e sensibile: Prospettive tra estetica e filosofia del linguaggio, vol. 17, Edizioni Nuova Cultura, pp. 41-46.

CARNAGHI, Andrea, MAASS, Anne (2007), «In-Group and Out-Group Perspectives in the Use of Derogatory Group Labels Gay Versus Fag», in Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 26, n. 2, pp. 142-156.

CEPOLLARO, Bianca (2015), «In defence of a presuppositional account of slurs», in Language Sciences, vol. 52, pp. 36-45.

CROOM, Adam M. (2013), «How to do things with slurs: Studies in the way of derogatory words», in Language & Communication, vol. 33, n. 3, pp. 177-204.

FASOLI, Fabio, PALADINO, Maria Paola, CARNAGHI, Andrea (2013), «Le conseguenze del linguaggio omofobo su omosessuali ed eterosessuali», in Psicologia sociale, vol. 8, n. 2, pp. 177-192.

FREGE, Gottlob (1918), «Der Gedanke», in Beitragezur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, 1, 58-77 (Il pensiero, trad. it. in FREGE, Gottlob (1988) Scritti logici, Guerini, Milano).

GRICE, Herbert Paul (1975), Logic and Conversation, in COLE, Peter, e MORGAN, Jerry L., a cura di, Syntax and Semantics Volume 3: Speech Acts, pp.41-58.

HEIM, Irene (1992), «Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs», in Journal of semantics, vol. 9, n. 3, pp. 183-221.

HOM, Christopher (2008), «The semantics of racial epithets», in The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 105, n. 8, pp. 416-440.

HORN, Laurence R. (1985), «Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity», in Language, pp. 121-174.

JESHION, Robyn (2013), «Slurs and stereotypes», in Analytic Philosophy, vol. 54, n. 3, pp. 314-329.

KARTTUNEN, Lauri (1973), «Presuppositions of compound sentences», in Linguistic inquiry, vol. 4, n. 2, pp. 169-193.

KARTTUNEN, Lauri, PETERS, Stanley (1979), Conventional Implicature, in OH, Choon-Kyue e DINNEEN, David A., a cura di, Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition, New York Academic Press, New York.

KENNEDY, Randall (2008), Nigger: The strange career of a troublesome word, Vintage edition, New York.

KRATZER, Angelika (1999), «Beyond ouch and oops: How descriptive and expressive meaning interact», manoscritto disponibile su Semantics Archive.

MCCREADY, Eric Scott (2010), «Varieties of conventional implicature», in Semantics and Pragmatics, vol. 3, pp. 1-57.

PANZERI, Francesca (2016), «Gli slurs tra filosofia del linguaggio e linguistica», in Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio vol. 10, n.1, pp. 64-67.

POTTS, Christopher (2005), The logic of conventional implicatures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

POTTS, Christopher (2007), «The expressive dimension», in Theoretical linguistics, vol. 33, n. 2, pp. 165-198.

SCHLENKER, Philippe (2007), «Expressive presuppositions», in Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 33, n. 2, pp. 237-245.

SPOTORNO, Nicola, BIANCHI, Claudia (2015), «A plea for an experimental approach on slurs», in Language Sciences, vol. 52, pp. 241-250.

WILLIAMSON, Timothy (2009), «Reference, inference and the semantics of pejoratives», in ALMOG, Joseph e LEONARDI, Paolo, a cura di, The Philosophy of David Kaplan, Oxford University Press, pp. 137-158.

Published
2016-10-31
How to Cite
Panzeri, F. (2016) “L’offensività degli slurs. Un’indagine sperimentale / The offensiveness of slurs: an experimental investigation”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 00. Available at: http://www.rifl.unical.it/index.php/rifl/article/view/356 (Accessed: 24January2021).