Embodiment and Persuasion. The communicative power of metaphors

  • Valentina Cuccio
Keywords: Metaphors, persuasion, embodied simulation, embodied persuasion, transportation theory

Abstract

Persuasion, the ability to linguistically affect other people attitudes and beliefs, has a crucial role in our life, from everyday choices to political orientations. For this reason, understanding its mechanisms is one of the most burning questions for modern societies. Metaphors have always had a special role in research on persuasion, being considered powerful persuasive devices. However, so far, divergent findings have been obtained. As a consequence, the mechanisms and extent of the persuasiveness of metaphors are still partly unknown. The specific role of metaphors in persuasion will be addressed here using a novel approach developed across philosophy, social psychology and neuroscience and through the combination of findings from all these disciplines. On the basis of data from all these different fields, it will be presented and discussed the hypothesis that persuasion can partly rely on the recruitment of bodily experiences and that metaphors are particularly suited to exploiting them. The processing of bodily metaphors (namely, metaphors such as “to see an idea” or “to grasp a concept”, based on bodily experiences) determines the activation of our sensory and motor systems. It will be hypothesized that bodily-based metaphors increase persuasive effects and that their effectiveness relies exactly on the recruitment of the sensory and motor systems

References

ARISTOTELE, Ars Rhetorica, ed. W.D. Ross, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1966.

AZIZ-ZADEH, Lisa, WILSON, Stephen, RIZZOLATTI, Giacomo and IACOBONI, Marco (2006), «Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions», in Curr Biol, n.16 (18), doi: S0960-9822(06)01968-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.060, pp.1818-1823.

BARSALOU, Laurence (2010). «Grounded cognition: past, present, and future», in Top Cogn Sci, n. 2 (4), doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115. x, pp.716-724.

BOULANGER, Véronique, HAUK, Olaf and PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann (2009), «Grasping ideas with the motor system: semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension», in Cereb Cortex, n. 19 (8), doi: bhn217 [pii] 10.1093/cercor/bhn217, pp.1905-1914.

BOULANGER, Véronique, SHTYROV, Yuri, and PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann (2012), «When do you grasp the idea? MEG evidence for instantaneous idiom understanding», in Neuroimage, n. 59 (4), doi: S1053-8119(11)01291-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.011, pp. 3502-3513.

BOWDLE, Brian and GENTNER, Dedre (2005). «The career of metaphor», in Psychol Rev, n. 112 (1), doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193, pp.193-216.

BOWERS, John Waite and OSBORN, Michael (1966), «Attitudinal effects of selected types of concluding metaphors in persuasive speeches», in Speech Monographs, n. 33, pp. 147–155.

.

BRINÕL, Pablo and PETTY, Richard (2008), Embodied persuasion: Fundamental processes by which bodily responses can impact attitudes, in GÜN SEMIN and ELIOT SMITH (Eds.), Embodiment grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches, Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press, pp. 184-207.

BRUNER, Denis, MURRAY, Micah, CRISTOPH, Michel, (2011), «Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL», in Comput Intell Neurosci. doi: 10.1155/2011/813870.

BUCCINO, Giovanni, RIGGIO, Lucia, MELLI, Gabriele, BINKOFSKI, Ferdinand, GALLESE, Vittorio and RIZZOLATTI, Giacomo (2005), «Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study», in Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, n. 24 (3), doi: S0926-6410(05)00050-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.020, pp. 355-363.

BURGERS, Christian, KONIJN, Elly, STEEN, Gerard. and IEPSMA, Marlies (2015), «Making ads less complex, yet more creative and persuasive: The effects of conventional metaphors and irony in print advertising», in International Journal of Advertising, n. 34(3), pp. 515-532.

CACCIARI, Cristina, BOLOGNINI, Nadia, SENNA, Irene, PELLICCIARI, Maria Concetta, MINIUSSI, Carlo and PAPAGNO, Costanza (2011), «Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: a TMS study», in Brain Lang n. 119 (3), doi: S0093-934X (11)00104-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.004, pp. 149-157.

CHARTERIS-BLACK, Jonathan (2004), Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis, Palgrave-MacMillan, New York.

CUCCIO, Valentina and STEEN, Gerard, (forthcoming). Attention to Metaphor. From neurons to representations, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

DESAI, Rutvik, BINDER, Jeffrey, CONANT, Lisa, MANO, Quintino and SEIDENBERG, Mark (2011), «The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors», in J Cogn Neurosci, n. 23 (9), doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21596, pp. 2376-2386.

DESAI, Rutvik, CONANT, Lisa, BINDER, Jeffrey, PARK, Haeil and SEIDENBERG, Mark (2013), «A piece of the action: modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors», in Neuroimage, n. 83, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.044, pp. 862-869.

FISHER, Martin and ZWAAN, Rolf (2008), «Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension», in Q J Exp Psychol (Hove), n. 61(6), pp. 825-850.

FORONI, Francesco and SEMIN, Gün (2009), «Language that puts you in touch with your bodily feelings: the multimodal responsiveness of affective expressions», in Psychol Sci, n. 20 (8), doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02400. x, pp. 974-980.

FREY, Kurt and EAGLY, Alice (1993), «Vividness can undermine persuasiveness of messages», in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, n. 65, pp. 32–44.

FRIDLUND, Alan and CACIOPPO, John (1986), «Guidelines for human electromyographic research», in Psychophysiology, n. 23 (5), pp. 567-589.

GALLESE, Vittorio and SINIGAGLIA, Corrado (2011), «What is so special about embodied simulation?», in Trends Cogn Sci, n. 15 (11), doi: S1364-6613(11)00194-X [pii] 10.1016/j.tics.2011.09.003, pp. 512-519.

GENTNER, Dedre, and BOWDLE, Brian (2008), Metaphor as structure-mapping, in GIBBS, Raymond. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, University Press Cambridge, Cambridge, pp. 109-128.

GERRIG, Richard (1993), Experiencing narrative worlds: on the psychological activities of reading, New Haven, Conn; Yale University Press, London.

GIBBS, Raymond (2003), «Embodied experience and linguistic meaning», in Brain Lang, n. 84 (1), pp.1-15.

GIBBS, Raymond (2005), Embodiment and cognitive science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

GIBBS, Raymond (2006), «Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation», in Mind and Language, n. 21, pp. 434-458.

GIBBS, Raymond (2013), «Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives», in J Psycholinguist Res, n. 42 (4), doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9222-6, pp. 363-378.

GIBBS, Raymond and MATLOCK, Teenie (2008), Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence, in GIBBS, Raymond (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 161-176.

GIBBS, Raymod, and PERLMAN, Marcus, (2010), «Language understanding is grounded in experiential simulations: a response to Weiskopf», in Stud Hist Philos Sci, n. 41 (3), pp. 305-308.

GIORA, Rachel (2003), On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language, Oxford University Press, New York.

GLENBERG, Arthur and KASCHAK, Michael (2002), «Grounding language in action», in Psychon Bull Re. n. 9 (3), pp. 558-565.

.

GLENBERG, Arthur, SATO, Marc, CATTANEO, Luigi, RIGGIO, Lucia, PALUMBO, Daniele, and BUCCINO, Giovanni (2008), «Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity», in Q J Exp Psychol (Hove), n. 61 (6), doi: 790266283 [pii] 10.1080/17470210701625550, pp. 905-19.

GLENBERG, Arthur, WITT, Jessica and METCALFE, Janet (2013), «From the Revolution to Embodiment: 25 Years of Cognitive Psychology», in Perspectives on Psychological Science, n. 8, pp. 573-585.

GRAESSER, Arthur, MIO, Jeffrey and MILLIS, Keith (1989), Metaphors in persuasive communication, in MEUTSCH, Dietrich (Ed.), Models of Literary Understanding, Elesevier, Amsterdam, (pp. 131–154),

GREEN, Melanie (2004), «Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism», in Discourse Processes, n. 38, pp. 247-266.

GREEN, Melanie and BROCK, Timoty (2000), «The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narrative», in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, n. 79(5), pp. 701-721.

GREEN, Melanie and BROCK, Timoty (2002), In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion, in GREEN, Melanie, STRANGE, Jeffrey and BROCK, Timoth (Eds), Narrative impact: social and cognitive foundations, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, (pp. 315-342).

HAUK, Olaf, JOHNSRUDE, Ingrid and PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann (2004), «Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex», in Neuron, n. 41 (2), doi: S0896627303008389 [pii], pp. 301-307.

HITCHON, Jacqueline (1997), «The locus of metaphorical persuasion: An empirical tes», in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, n. 74, pp. 55–68.

ITO, Tiffany, CHIAO, Krystal, DEVINE, Patricia, LORIG, Tyler and CACIOPPO, John (2006), «The influence of facial feedback on race bias», in Psychological Science, n. 17, pp. 256-261.

JIRAK, Doreen, MENZ, Mareike, BUCCINO, Giovanni, BORGHI, Anna and BINKOFSKI, Ferdinad (2010), «Grasping language--a short story on embodiment», in Conscious Cogn, n. 19(3), doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.020, pp. 711-720.

JOHNSON, Joel and TAYLOR, Sheley (1981), «The effect of metaphor on political attitudes», in Basic and Applied Social Psychology, n. 2, pp. 305–316.

KEMMERER, David, CASTILLO, Javier TALAVAGE, Thomas, PATTERSON, Stephanie and WILEY, Cynthia (2008), «Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: evidence from FMRI», in Brain Lang, n. 107 (1), doi: S0093-934X (07)00261-1 [pii] 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.09.003, pp.16-43.

KRUMDICK, Nate, OTTATI, Victor and DEIGER, Megan (2004), «Metaphors and Persuasive Communication: The Cognitive Coherence Hypothesis» Austin, TX: Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology.

LANDAU, Mark, SULLIVAN, Daniel and GREENBERG, Jeff (2009), «Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitude», in Psychological Science, n. 20, pp. 1421–1427.

MATLOCK, Teenie, RAMSCAR, Michael and BORODITSKY, Lera (2005), «The experiential link between spatial and temporal language», in Cognitive Science, n. 29, pp. 655-664.

MIO, Jeffry (1996), Metaphor, politics, and persuasion, in MIO, Jeffry and KATZ, Albert (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and Applications, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 127–145.

MOYER-GUSÉ, Emily (2008), «Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages», in Communication Theory, n. 18, pp. 407-425.

OTTATI, Victor and RENSTROM, Randall (2010), «Metaphor and persuasive communication: A Multifunctional Approach», in Social and Personality Psychology Compass, n. 4 (9), pp. 783-794.

OTTATI, Victor., RHOADS, Susan and GRAESSER, Arthur (1999), «The effect of metaphor on processing style in a persuasion task: A motivational resonance model», in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, n. 77, pp. 688–697.

PAPEO, LIUBA, VALLESI, ANTONINO, ISAJA, ALESSIO and RUMIATI, RAFFAELLA (2009), «Effects of TMS on different stages of motor and non-motor verb processing in the primary motor cortex», in PLoS One, n. 4 (2): e4508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004508.

PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann (1999), «Words in the brain's language», in Behav Brain Sci, n. 22 (2), pp. 253-79.

PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann, MOSELEY, Rachel, EGOROVA, Natalia, SHEBANI, Zubaida and BOULENGER, Véronique (2014), «Motor cognition-motor semantics: action perception theory of cognition and communication», in Neuropsychologia, n. 55, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.002, pp.71-84.

RAPOSO, Ana, MOSS, Helen, STAMATAKIS, Emmanuel and TYLER, Lorraine (2009), «Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences», in Neuropsychologia, n. 47 (2), doi: S0028-3932(08)00376-X [pii] 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.017, pp. 388-396.

READ, STEPHEN, CESA, IAN, JONES, DAVID and COLLINS, NANCY (1990), "When is the federal budget like a baby? Metaphor in political rhetoric", in Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, n. 5, pp. 125–149.

RITCHIE, David (2008), «X IS A JOURNEY: Embodied Simulation in Metaphor Interpretation», in Metaphor and Symbol, n. 23(3), pp. 174-199.

RITCHIE, David (2010), «Everybody goes down": Metaphors, Stories, and Simulations in Conversations», in Metaphor and Symbol, n. 25, pp. 123-143.

ROEHM, Michelle and STERNTHAL, Brian (2001), «The moderating effect of knowledge and resources on the persuasive impact of analogies», in Journal of Consumer Research, n. 28, pp. 257–272.

SATO, Marc, MENGARELLI, Marisa, RIGGIO, Lucia, GALLESE, Vittorio and BUCCINO, Giovanni (2008), «Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing», in Brain Lang, n. 105 (2), doi: S0093-934X (07)00276-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.001, pp. 83-90.

SEMINO, Elena (2010), «Descriptions of Pain, Metaphors, and Embodied Simulation», in Metaphor and Symbol, n. 25(4), pp. 205-26.

SOPORY, Pradeep and DILLARD, James (2002), «The persuasive effects of metaphor: A literature review and meta-analysis», in Human Communication Research, n. 28, pp. 382–419.

STEEN, Gerad (2011), «The contemporary theory of metaphor - now new and improved! », in Review of Cognitive Linguistics, n. 9(1), pp. 26-64.

STRACK, Fritz, MARTIN, Leonard and STEPPER, Sabine (1988), «Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis», in J Pers Soc Psychol, n. 54 (5), pp.768-777.

STRANGE, Jeffrey and LEUNG, Chyntia (1999), «How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social problem's urgency, causes, and cures», in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, n. 25, pp. 436-449.

TETTAMANTI, Marco, BUCCINO, Giovanni, SACCUMAN, Maria Cristina, GALLESE, Vittorio, DANNA, Massimo, SCIFO, Paola, FAZIO, Ferrucciio, RIZZOLATTI, Giacomo, CAPPA, Stefano and PERANI, Daniela (2005), «Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits», in J Cogn Neurosci, n. 17 (2), doi: 10.1162/0898929053124965, pp. 273-81.

TZUYIN LAI, Vicky, and CURRAN, Tim (2013), «ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors», in Brain Lang, n. 127 (3), doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.010, pp.484-496.

ZAJONC, Robert, MURPHY, Sheila and INGLEHART Marita (1989), «Feeling and facial efference: implications of the vascular theory of emotion», in Psychol Rev, n. 96(3), pp. 395-416.

WOJCIEHOWSKI, Hannah, GALLESE, Vittorio (2011), «How stories make us feel. Toward an embodied narratology», in California Italian Studies, n. 2 (1).

YANG, Jie and SHU, Hua (2015), «Involvement of the Motor System in Comprehension of Non-Literal Action Language: A Meta-Analysis Study», in Brain Topogr. doi: 10.1007/s10548-015-0427-5.

How to Cite
Cuccio, V. (1) “Embodiment and Persuasion. The communicative power of metaphors”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 00. Available at: http://www.rifl.unical.it/index.php/rifl/article/view/375 (Accessed: 20May2024).
Section
Articoli