Metaphor: the good argument in science communication

  • Giulia Frezza
Keywords: metaphor and scientific argumentation, metaphor analysis, resistance to metaphor, critical discourse analysis, science communication

Abstract

The relation between metaphor and argumentation in science communication is becoming a crucial tool for critical metaphor studies. In this article, by means of a crossed analysis (epistemological, cognitive and linguistic), I focus especially on a peculiar dynamic of metaphor use in scientific communication showing opposite, paradoxical attitudes towards the use of metaphors, respectively, ubiquity vs. invisibility, inclination vs. resistance, deliberate vs. non-deliberate. In this way, an overall philosophical reflection about the underlying reasons for the ambivalence in the use of metaphor in scientific communication would be proposed and discussed.

References

BALL, Philip (2011), «A metaphor too far», in Nature News, 23 February, pp. 1-8, http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110223/full/news.2011.115.html.

BLACK, Max (1954), «Metaphor», in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n. 55, pp. 273-294.

BLACK, Max (1993), More about metaphors, in ORTONY Andrew (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 273-294.

BLUMENBERG, Hans (2010), Paradigms for a Metaphorology, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

CAVELL, Stanley (1994), In quest of the ordinary, University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London.

COMFORT, Nethaniel (2013), «Genetics: The genetic watchmaker», in Nature, n. 502, pp. 436-437.

CRAWFORD, Paul, BROWN, Brian, NERLICH, Brigitte, KOTEYKO, Nelya (2008), «The ‘moral careers’ of microbes and the rise of the matrons, 1995-2006», in Health, Risk & Society, n. 10 (4), pp.331-347.

DEACON, Terence (1997), The symbolic species, W.W. Norton & Co, New York.

DE MARCHI, Bruna, RAVETZ, Jerry R. (1999), «Risk management and governance: A post-normal science approach», in Futures, n. 31, pp.743-757.

DÍAZ-VERA, Javier (2015), Metaphor and Metonymy across Time and Cultures, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin.

ERVAS, Francesca, GOLA, Elisabetta, ROSSI, MariaGrazia (2015) «Metaphors and Emotions as Framing Strategies in Argumentation», in EAPCogSci, vol. 1419 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org.

FINKBEINER, Ann (2011), Science Metaphors (cont.): Degeneracy, http://www.lastwordonnothing.com/2011/11/24/sciencemetaphorscontdegeneracy/(last accessed 3 Jun 2016).

FREZZA, Giulia, GAGLIASSO, Elena (2016), Building Metaphors: Constitutive Narratives in Science, in GOLA Elisabetta, ERVAS Francesca, ROSSI Maria Grazia (eds.), Metaphor in Communication, Science and Education, De Gruyter Mouton (accepted), Berlin.

FREZZA, Giulia, LONGO, Giuseppe (2010), «Variations on the theme of invariants: conceptual and mathematical dualities in physics vs. biology», in Human Evolution, n. 25 (3-4), pp.167-172.

FRISARI, Francesco (2010), Era solo una metafora: logiche di una svalutazione, in GAGLIASSO Elena, FREZZA Giulia (eds.), Metafore del vivente, Franco Angeli, Milano.

GAGLIASSO, Elena (2008), Organismo e individuo come arcipelaghi di metafore, in CALABI Lorenzo (ed.), Il futuro di Darwin. L’individuo, Utet, Torino.

GIBBS, Raymond W. (2008), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, New York.

GIGERENZER, Gerd (2007), Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, Viking, New York.

GIORA, Rachel (1997), «Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis», in Cognitive Linguistics, n. 7 (1), pp. 183-206.

GIORA, Rachel (2008), Is metaphor unique?, in GIBBS Raymond W. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

HOBBES Thomas (1651), Leviathan, (reprinted from the edition 1651), Clarendon Press, Oxford 1909.

HELLSTEN, Iina, NERLICH, Brigitte (2011) «Synthetic biology: building the language for a new science brick by metaphorical brick», in New Genetics and Society, n. 30 (4), pp. 375-397.

HESSE, Mary (1966), Models and analogies in science, University Notre Dame Press, Indiana.

JASANOFF, Sheila (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton University Press, Princeton & Oxford.

JASANOFF, Sheila, HURLBUT, Benjamin, SAHA, Krishanu (2015), «CRISPR Democracy: Gene Editing and the Need for Inclusive Deliberation», in Issues in Science & Technology, 32, n. 1, disponibile su http://issues.org/32-1/crispr-democracy-gene-editing-and-the-need-for-inclusive-deliberation/.

JAMROZIK, Anja, MCQUIRE, Marguerite, CARDILLO, Eileen, CHATTERJEE, Anjan (2016), «Metaphor: bridging embodiment to abstraction», in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, n. 23 (4), pp. 1080-1089.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow, Macmillan, New York.

KISER, Barbara (2015) «Metaphor and message», http://blogs.nature.com/aviewfro

mthebridge/2015/04/30/metaphor-and-message/ (last accessed 3 June 2016).

LAKOFF, George, JOHNSON, Mark (1980), Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

LEECH, Geoffrey (1983), Principles of pragmatics, Longman, Harlow.

LOETTGERS, Andrea (2013), «Communication: Metaphors advance scientific research», in Nature, 502, 303 (17 October 2013).

NERLICH, Brigitte, CLARKE, David (2001), «Ambiguities we live by: towards a pragmatics of polysemy», in Journal of Pragmatics, n. 33, pp. 1-20.

NERLICH, Brigitte, ELLIOTT, Richard, LARSON, Brendon (2016), Communicating Biological Sciences: Ethical and Metaphorical Dimensions, Routledge, Oxford.

PROCTOR, Robert, SCHIEBINGER, Londa (2008), Agnotology. The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

SCHARF, Caleb (2013), «In Defense Of Metaphors in Science Writing», http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/life-unbounded/in-defense-of-metaphors-in-science-writing.

STEEN, Gerard (2008), «The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor», in Metaphor & Symbol, n. 23, pp. 213-241.

STEEN, Gerard (2013), «Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition», in Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, n. 5, pp. 179-197.

STEEN, Gerard (2015), «Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory», in Journal of Pragmatics, n. 90, pp. 67-72.

WEINGART, Peter, MAASEN, Sabine, MENDELSHON, Everett (1995), Biology as society, society as biology: metaphors, Springer, Dordrecht.

WIMMER, Andreas, KÖSSLER, Reinhart (2006), Understanding Change Models, Methodologies, and Metaphors, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

How to Cite
Frezza, G. (1) “Metaphor: the good argument in science communication”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 10(2). Available at: http://www.rifl.unical.it/index.php/rifl/article/view/402 (Accessed: 29June2022).