Spettri, androidi e figure del trauma: sul rapporto mente-corpo a partire dal perturbante di Freud
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4396/2025SFL04Parole chiave:
uncanny, Freud, mind/body relationship, haunted houses, androids, traumaAbstract
This article offers a reinterpretation of Sigmund Freud’s renowned essay The Uncanny (1919a), focusing on the connection between the uncanny and the mind/body relationship. Starting from Freud's well-known antinomy between familiarity and strangeness, I aim to demonstrate that one of the most significant manifestations of the uncanny emerges precisely when the perception of continuity between mind and body is disrupted. The analysis begins with the figure of the ghost, a Freudian example that is less frequently cited than others (such as the doll), but rich in symbolic implications, including the return of magical thinking, the strangeness of familiar places, and the relationship with death. Next, we will examine two other paradigmatic figures of the uncanny: the android, which embodies the ambiguity between human and artificial, and traumatic experiences, the uncanny core of which is the loss of consciousness. Through these three cases, I will attempt to highlight the fragility of the boundary between the self and body, emphasizing how this fracture is one of the main sources of the uncanny.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Barbetta, Paolo (2014), La follia rivisitata. Umori, demenze, isterie, Mimesis, Milano-Udine.
Coulombe, Maxime (2014), Piccola filosofia dello zombie, o come riflettere attraverso l’orrore, Mimesis, Milano-Udine.
Freud, Sigmund (1919a), «Das Unheimliche», in Imago, vol. 5 n.5-6, pp. 297-394, («Il perturbante», in Opere 1905/1921, Newton Compton, Roma 1992, pp. 1049-1070).
Freud, Sigmund (1919b), «Einleitung zu Zur Psychoanalyse der Kriegneurosen», in Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, Leipzig, Wien und Zürich («Introduzione a Psicoanalisi delle nevrosi di guerra», in Opere 1905/1921, Newton Compton, Roma 1992, pp. 1071-1073).
Freud, Sigmund (1920), «Jenseitz des Lustprinzips», in Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, Leipzig, Wien und Zürich, («Al di là del principio del piacere», in Opere 1905/1921, Newton Compton, Roma 1992, pp. 1099-1139).
Frosh, Stephen (2012), «Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and Ghostly Transmission», in American Imago, vol. 69, n. 2, pp. 241–264.
Grider, Sylvia Ann (2007), Haunted Houses, in Diane E. Goldstein, Sylvia Ann Grider, Jeannie Banks Thomas (eds.), Haunting experiences: ghosts in contemporary folklore, Utah State University Press, Logan, Utah, pp.143-170.
Hayles, Nancy Catherine (1999), How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Jentsch, Ernst (1906), «Zur Psychologie des Unheimlichen», in Psychiatrisch-Neurologische Wochenschrift, 8.22, pp. 195-98, e 8.23, pp. 203-05 (On the psychology of the uncanny, R. Sellars http://www.art3idea.psu.edu/locus/Jentsch_uncanny.pdf).
Latour, Bruno (2018), Non siamo mai stati moderni, Eleuthera, Milano.
Malabou, Catherine (2007), Les nouveaux blessés: De Freud à la neurologie, penser les traumatismes contemporains, Bayard Éditions, Montrouge.
McEwan, Ian (2019), Machines like me, Jonathan Cape, London («Macchine come me e persone come voi», Einaudi, Torino 2019).
Mori, Masahiro (1970), «The uncanny valley (Bukimi no tani)», in Energy, n.7, pp. 33-35.
Plinio Il Giovane, Epistularum Libri Decem, Liber VII, Ep. 27. in Opere di Plinio Cecilio Secondo, a cura di F. Trisoglio, vol. I, Torino 1973, pp. 748-755.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
