War, race and sustainability: metaphorical frames for climate change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4396/2025SFL17Parole chiave:
metaphor, framing, climate change, war, race, sustainabilityAbstract
The paper considers two frequently used metaphors in talking and thinking about climate change: the WAR metaphor and the RACE metaphor. The paper explores the effects of these metaphors on our understanding of climate change, highlighting their positive communicative aspects, as well as their limitations and potential negative implications in addressing the environmental issues, leading to an emphasis on competition rather than collaboration. To address these limitations, the paper suggests revitalizing the sustain metaphor as a more effective way to conceptualize climate change. This metaphor focuses on Sustaining the Earth and the ecosystem, rather than overcoming an enemy or competing in a race. It can shift our attention towards long-term sustainability and interdependence of all living organisms, better presenting the complex and interconnected nature of the climate change phenomenon.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Armstrong, A. K., Krasny, M. E., Jonathon, P. S. (2018), Using metaphor and analogy in climate change communication, in Krasny Marianne E., eds., Communicating climate change: A guide for educators, Comstock Publishing Associates an imprint of Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, 70–74.
Atanasova, D., Koteyko, N. (2015), «War and religion: The metaphors hampering climate change debate», (accessed 4 may 2025), https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27358-war-and-religion-the-metaphors-hampering-climate-change-debate/.
Black, Max (1955), «XII.—Metaphor», in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 55, issue 1, (june 1955), 273–294, https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/55.1.273.
Blackburn, Simon (1984), Spreading the word. Groundings in the Philosophy of Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bolstad, Erika (2016), «World war mentality needed to beat climate change», in Scientific American, (accessed 4 may 2025), https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/world-war-mentality-needed-to-beat-climate-change/.
Bowdle, B., Gentner, D. (2005), «The career of metaphor», in Psychological Review, 112, n. 1, 193–216.
Boyd, Richard (1979), Metaphor and theory change: What is “metaphor” a metaphor for?, in Ortony Andrew, eds., Metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1993), 481–532.
Carroll, Noël (1994), Visual metaphor, in Jaakko Hintikka, eds, Aspects of Metaphor, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht – Boston – London, 189–218.
Damerall, A. W., Kellogg, D. (2016), «Familiarity and aptness in metaphor comprehension», in American Journal of Psychology, 129 (1), 49–64, https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.1.0049.
Entman, Robert M. (1993), «Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm», in Journal of Communication, vol. 43, issue 4, 51–58, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
Ervas, Francesca (2021), «Metaphor, ignorance, and the sentiment of (ir)rationality», in Synthese, vol. 198, n. 7, (july 2021), 6789–6813.
Ervas, F., Ledda, A., Ojha, A., Pierro, G. A., Indurkhya, B. (2018), «Creative argumentation: When and why people commit the metaphoric fallacy», in Frontiers in Psychology, (september ), 9:1815, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01815.
Ervas, F., Rossi, M. G., Ojha, A., Indurkhya, B. (2021), «The double framing effect of emotive metaphors in argumentation», in Frontiers in Psychology, (14 june 2021), 12:628460, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628460.
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., Thibodeau, P. H. (2017), «Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change», in Environmental Communication, 11 (6), (02 march 2027), 769–783, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111.
Forceville, C. (1994). Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0901_1
Forceville, Charles (2002), «The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors», in Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (1), 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00007-8.
Forceville, Charles (2008) Metaphors in pictures and multimodal representations, in Raymond W., Gibbs Jr., eds., The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 462–482, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028.
Forceville, C., Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009), eds., Multimodal metaphor, Mouton de Gruyter, New York.
Frezza, Giulia (2016), «Metaphor: The good argument in science communication», in RIFL-Rivista italiana di filosofia del linguaggio, vol. 10, n. 2, 21–33, doi:10.4396/20161206.
Frezza, Giulia. (2018), “Decline” vs. “Plasticity”. Conflicting narratives in the dementia tsunami, in Ceccarelli David, Frezza Giulia, eds., Predictability and the unpredictable: Life, evolution and behavior., CNR Edizioni, Roma, 157–173.
Gallagher, Kevin P. (2009), «Economic Globalization and the Environment», in Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 279–304.
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. (2008), Metaphor and Structure-Mapping, in Gibbs Raymond W., eds., The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 109–128, doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.008.
Gibbs, Raymond W. (1994), The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gibbs, Raymond W. (2017), Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Giora, Rachel (2001), Irony and its discontent, in Steen Gerard J., Schram Dick H., eds., Psychology of language: In honor of Elrud Ibsch, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 165–184, https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.35.11gio.
Giora, Rachel (2003), On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Gola, E., Ervas, F., Amitash, O. (2019), Comprensione multimodale: metafore visive vs. metafore verbali, in Paternoster Alfredo, Pisanty Valentina, eds., La comprensione linguistica, Mimesis, Milano-Udine, 97–121.
Goffman, Erving (1955), «On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction», in Psychiatry, 18 (3), 213–231, https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955. 11023008.
Hesse, Mary (1988), Theories, family resemblances and analogy, in Helman David H., eds., Analogical Reasoning. Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy, (Synthese Library. Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science), Springer, Dordrecht, 317–340.
Hofstadter, Douglas R. (1995), The fluid analogies research group: Fluid concepts and creative analogies, Basic Books, New York.
Indurkhya, Bipin (2010), On the role of metaphor in creative cognition, in Ventura Dan, Pease Alison, Peìrez Rafael, Ritchie Graeme, Veale Tony, eds., Proceedings of the international conference on computational creativity: ICCC-X, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, 51–59.
Kirby, Alex (2004), «Earth warned on “tipping points”», in BBC News, (26 august 2004). http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3597584.stm (accessed 4 may 2025).
Kövecses, Zoltan (2002), Metaphor: A practical introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kövecses, Zoltan (2005), Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors we live by, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Mazzone, Marco (2015), «Constructing the context through goals and schemata: Top-down processes in comprehension and beyond», in Frontiers in Psychology, (may 2015), 6:651, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00651.
McKibben, Bill (2016), «A world at war. We’re under attack from climate change – and our only hope is to mobilize like we did in WWII», in The New Republic, (15 august 2016), https://newrepublic.com/article/135684/declare-war-climate-change-mobilize-wwii (accessed 4 may 2025).
Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., Clawson, R. A. (1997), «Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects», in Political Behavior, vol. 19. 221–246, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102483 4831093.
Nisbet, Matthew C. (2009), «Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement», in Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51 (2), 12–23, https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23.
Ortony, Andrew (1975), «Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice», in Educational Theory, 25 (1), 45–53, doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1975.tb00666.x.
Schnell, Z., Ervas, F. (2022), «Intercultural discussion of conceptual universals in discourse: joint online methodology to bring about social change through novel conceptualizations of Covid-19», in Nature – Humanites and Social Sciences Communications, 9 (1), 215, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01230-4.
Semino, Elena (2008), Metaphor in discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sopory, P., Dillard, J. (2002), «The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis», in Human Communication Research, 28 (3), 382–419, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x.
Steen, Gerard J. (2008), «The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model for metaphor», in Metaphor and Symbol, 23 (4), 213–241, https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753.
Steen, Gerard J. (2010), When is metaphor deliberate?, in Johannesson Nils L., Alm-Arvius Christina, Minugh David C., eds., Selected papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, 109–127.
Steen, Gerard J. (2013), «Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition», in Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, vol. 5, n. 1-2, 179–197.
Steen, Gerard J. (2017), «Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues», in Intercultural Pragmatics, 14 (1), 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1515/IP-2017-0001.
Thibodeau, P. H., Boroditsky, L. (2011), «Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning», in PLoS ONE, 6 (2), (23 february 2011), e16782, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782.
Thibodeau, P. H., Boroditsky, L. (2013), «Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning», in PLoS ONE 8, (1), e52961, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0052961.
Van der Hel, S., Hellsten, L., Steen, G. (2018), «Tipping points and climate change: Metaphor between science and the media», in Environmental Communication, 12 (5), 605–620, doi: 10.1080/17524032.2017.1410198.
Van Poppel, Lotte (2020), «The relevance of metaphor in argumentation. Uniting pragma-dialectics and deliberate metaphor theory», in Journal of Pragmatics, 170, (december 2020), 245–252, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.007.
Van Poppel, Lotte (2021), «The study of metaphor in argumentation theory», in Argumentation, 35, 177–208, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09523-1.
Wagemans, Jean (2016), «Analysing metaphor in argumentative discourse», in RIFL-Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 2, 79–94, doi:10.4396/20161207.
Wagemans, Jean H. M. 2019. “Four Basic Argument Forms”. Research in Language 17 (1): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2019-0005.
Wilson, D., Carston, R. (2006), «Metaphor, relevance and the “emergent property” issue», in Mind and Language, 21 (3), 404–433, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00284.x.
Watts, Jonathan (2018), «Global warming should be called global heating», in The Guardian, 13 December 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/ 13/global-heating-more-accurate-to-describe-risks-to-planet-says-key-scientist (accessed 4 may 2025).
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
